Supreme Court· 6/22/2023

Jones v. Hendrix

Citations

599 U.S. 465

Oral argument

Argued
80 min recording
Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that inmate cannot pursue Rehaif relief on Section 2241 motion despite second or successive bar in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)
holding that a prisoner may not evade the restrictions on filing second or successive habeas petitions based on a “more favorable interpretation of statutory law adopted after . . . [movant’s] initial § 2255 motion was resolved.”
stating that “[b]ecause § 2255 is the ordinary vehicle for a collateral attack on a federal sentence, the straightforward negative inference from § 2255(h
explaining that a second or successive collateral attack on a federal sentence is not authorized unless one of two conditions in § 2255(h) is satisfied
explaining that “§ 2255(e) does not displace § 2241 when a prisoner challenges ‘the legality of his detention’ without attacking the validity of his sentence”
stating that “the clearest such circumstance is the sentencing court’s dissolution; a motion in a court that no longer exists is obviously ‘inadequate or ineffective’ for any purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clarence Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

90 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.