Jones v. Callahan 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that ALJ may consider evidence that a claimant has exaggerated his symptoms when evaluating claimant's subjective complaints of pain
• holding that a physician’s observation “of the discrepancies in [the claimant’s] appearance in the examining room and those outside when he did not know that he was observed” supported an ALJ’s finding that the claimant’s complaints were not fully credible
• holding immaterial evidence detailing a single incident occurring after decision and noting proper remedy for post-ALJ deterioration is a new application
• noting that ALJ may consider evidence that a claimant has exaggerated his or her symptoms when evaluating claimant's subjective complaints of pain
• noting that ALJ may consider evidence that a claimant has exaggerated his symptoms when evaluating claimant's subjective complaints of pain
• holding immaterial evidence detailing a single incident occurring after decision and noting proper remedy for post-ALJ deterioration is a new application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).