Skip to main content
· 7/7/2008

Lamp v. Astrue

Citations

  • 531 F.3d 629
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14273
  • 2008 WL 2631359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an ALJ can consider his own observations of the claimant as long as it is not the sole basis of his determination
  • determining that it was unclear from the record whether the AC reviewed new evidence and remanding
  • “While the ALJ’s observations cannot be the sole basis of his decision, it is not an error to include his observations as one of several factors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Bright, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.