Renee Toland v. Carolyn W. Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a treating physician includes limitations in a medical source statement that are not reflected in treatment notes or medical records, the inconsistency undermines the opinion and may diminish or eliminate the weight given to it
• concluding the nature of the treating physician’s opinion justified “relying more heavily on other opinions in the record”
• finding that “ALJ had sufficient reason to discount” treating provider’s opinion where he “included limitations in the MSS that ‘are not reflected in any treatment notes or medical records”
• finding that “ALJ had sufficient reason to discount” treating provider’s opinion where he “included limitations in the MSS that are not reflected in any treatment notes or medical records”
• finding that “ALJ had sufficient reason to discount” treating provider’s opinion where he “included limitations in the MSS that are not reflected in any treatment notes or medical records”
• finding that “ALJ had sufficient reason to discount” treating provider’s opinion where he “included limitations in the MSS that are not reflected in any treatment notes or medical records”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).