Eighth Circuit· 8/30/2011
Boettcher v. Astrue
Citations
- 652 F.3d 860
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18029
- 2011 WL 3802780
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Substantial evidence means less than a preponderance but enough that a reasonable person would find it adequate to support the decision.”
- “Substantial evidence means less than a preponderance but enough that a reasonable person would find it adequate to support the decision.”
- no error when ALJ fails to explain why impairment does not equal listing as long as overall conclusion is correct
- “Substantial evidence means less than a preponderance but enough that a reasonable person would find it adequate to support the decision.”
- “Substantial evidence means less than a preponderance but enough that a reasonable person would find it adequate to support the decision.”
- “Substantial evidence means less than a preponderance but enough that a reasonable person would find it adequate to support the decision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Bye, Shepherd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Curtis Igo v. Carolyn ColvinEighth Circuit· 2016-10-13· cited 263×
- Timothy Brown v. Carolyn W. ColvinEighth Circuit· 2016-06-17· cited 216×
- Donald Fentress v. Carolyn W. ColvinEighth Circuit· 2017-04-25· cited 216×
- Royce McDade v. Michael J. AstrueEighth Circuit· 2013-07-29· cited 128×
- Jeffrey Walker v. Commissioner, Social SecurityEighth Circuit· 2018-12-20· cited 52×
- Kevin Ross v. Martin O'MalleyEighth Circuit· 2024-02-13· cited 36×
- Dwain Bagwell v. Commissioner, Social SecurityEighth Circuit· 2019-02-28· cited 10×
- Mann v. ColvinN.D. Iowa· 2015-04-23· cited 8×
- Thiele v. AstrueD. Minnesota· 2012-03-05· cited 5×
- Tyson v. ColvinD. Nebraska· 2014-03-27· cited 2×
- Henning v. ColvinN.D. Iowa· 2013-08-22· cited 1×
- Vega v. ColvinN.D. Iowa· 2015-09-10
- Shannon Montgomery v. Martin O'MalleyEighth Circuit· 2024-12-13
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantEighth Circuit· 1984-07-17· cited 1,741×
- Mark S. Guilliams v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationEighth Circuit· 2005-01-04· cited 643×
- Moore v. AstrueEighth Circuit· 2009-07-14· cited 579×
- Wildman v. AstrueEighth Circuit· 2010-03-08· cited 572×
- Joann Reed v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityEighth Circuit· 2005-03-08· cited 561×
- Loyce McCoy v. Richard S. Schweiker, Clifford M. Stack v. Richard S. Schweiker, James D. Desedare v. Richard S. SchweikerEighth Circuit· 1982-06-21· cited 543×
- Finch v. AstrueEighth Circuit· 2008-11-24· cited 419×
- Wagner v. AstrueEighth Circuit· 2007-08-24· cited 378×
- Jones v. AstrueEighth Circuit· 2010-08-31· cited 366×
- Norman P. Pelkey v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationEighth Circuit· 2006-01-03· cited 358×
- Stefania Harris v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationEighth Circuit· 2004-01-30· cited 249×
- Partee v. AstrueEighth Circuit· 2011-04-20· cited 218×
- Stephen R. Snead v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartEighth Circuit· 2004-03-11· cited 218×
- Peggy S. Dunahoo v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationEighth Circuit· 2001-02-26· cited 181×
- Juszczyk v. AstrueEighth Circuit· 2008-09-15· cited 156×
- Roger Holmstrom v. Larry G. Massanari, 1 Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationEighth Circuit· 2001-10-29· cited 129×
- Reutter Ex Rel. Reutter v. BarnhartEighth Circuit· 2004-06-16· cited 128×
- Wiese v. AstrueEighth Circuit· 2009-01-16· cited 111×
- Marilyn Brosnahan v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationEighth Circuit· 2003-07-15· cited 99×
- Robert Karlix v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartEighth Circuit· 2006-08-03· cited 87×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.