Joiner Ex Rel. Rivas v. Rivas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is not error to rule on an issue raised to but not ruled on by the family court because “procedural rules are subservient to the court’s duty to zealously guard the rights of minors”
• approving the court of appeals’ conclusion that procedural rules are subservient to the court’s duty to zealously guard the rights of minors
• stating procedural rules are subservient to the court’s duty to zealously guard the rights of minors
• approving the court of appeals’ conclusion that procedural rules are subservient to the court’s duty to zealously guard the rights of minors
• approving the court of appeals' conclusion that procedural rules are subservient to the court's duty to zealously guard the rights of minors
• stating “procedural rules are subservient to the court’s duty to zealously guard the rights of minors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Joiner Ex Rel. Rivas v. Rivas

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Joiner ex rel. Rivas v. Rivas
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-05-10· cited 2×