Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2/28/1967
Galloway v. Galloway
Citations
- 153 S.E.2d 326
- 249 S.C. 157
- 1967 S.C. LEXIS 241
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding the court’s duty to protect the rights of minors has precedence over procedural rules
- this Court held it may reach any issue affecting the rights of minors ex mero motu
- this Court held it may reach any issue affecting the rights of minors ex mero motu
- “The duty to protect the rights of minors has precedence over procedural rules otherwise limiting the scope of review and matters affecting the rights of minors can be considered by this court ex mero motu.”
- \The duty to protect the rights of minors has precedence over procedural rules otherwise limiting the scope of review and matters affecting the rights of minors can be considered by this court ex mero motu.\
- \The duty to protect the rights of minors has precedence over procedural rules otherwise limiting the scope of review and matters affecting the rights of minors can be considered by this court.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moss, Lewis, Bussey, Brailsford, Baker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Joiner Ex Rel. Rivas v. RivasSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-08-15· cited 112×
- Ex Parte MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 109×
- Washington v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-12-19· cited 49×
- Harper v. CaskinSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1979-04-23· cited 49×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. BasnightCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-06-28· cited 25×
- Bevis v. BevisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1970-06-26· cited 21×
- S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-05-09· cited 20×
- In the Interest of Arisha K.S.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-05-11· cited 13×
- Hudson v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-05-25· cited 12×
- Stefan v. StefanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-12-28· cited 11×
- Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-06-26· cited 11×
- Thomas R. v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-03-02· cited 11×
- Doe v. South Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-12-28· cited 5×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-05-12· cited 4×
- Kalk v. ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-10-13· cited 3×
- Brown v. MickensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-07-06· cited 2×
- Joiner ex rel. Rivas v. RivasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-05-10· cited 2×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. RoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-12-21· cited 2×
- SC DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. RoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-12-21· cited 1×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. MonceauxSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.