Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 3/10/2003
Doe v. Baby Boy Roe
Citations
- 578 S.E.2d 733
- 353 S.C. 576
- 2003 S.C. App. LEXIS 26
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that parental rights can be terminated once a child has languished in foster care for fifteen out of the last twenty-two months and the family court finds termination is in the childs best interest
- finding that the ground of fifteen out of the last twenty-two months alone was sufficient to terminate Mothers parental rights when termination was in childs best interest
- stating once the appellate court finds a statutory ground on which the family court properly granted TPR, the court need only determine TPR was in the child's best interest to affirm
- “TPR statutes must be liberally construed in order to ensure prompt judicial procedures for freeing minor children from the custody and control of their parents by terminating the parent-child relationship.”
- [O]nce a child has been in foster care for fifteen months, whether those months are consecutive or within the last twenty-two months, the parental rights of that childs parents may be terminated upon a showing that termination is in the childs best interests.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hearn, Cureton, Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Charleston County Department of Social Services v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-03-06· cited 78×
- Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-03-21· cited 31×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Janice C.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-04-30· cited 23×
- Stinecipher v. BallingtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-09-12· cited 20×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. SimsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-14· cited 20×
- Peake v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-11-27· cited 12×
- Bradley v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-07-06· cited 11×
- Department of Social Services v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-08-08· cited 10×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Mother Ex Rel. Minor ChildCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-09-18· cited 8×
- Doe v. RoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-06-05· cited 4×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. TruittCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-10-11· cited 2×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. RoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-12-21· cited 2×
- SC DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. RoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-12-21· cited 1×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Joiner Ex Rel. Rivas v. RivasSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-08-15· cited 112×
- Hooper v. RockwellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-02-22· cited 91×
- Richland County Department of Social Services v. EarlesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-02-23· cited 39×
- Dorchester County Department of Social Services v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-14· cited 27×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. GambleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-10-18· cited 9×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-10-09· cited 8×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-06-21· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.