Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 12/6/2002

Johnson v. Wright

Citations

  • 234 F. Supp. 2d 352
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23462
  • 2002 WL 31741268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an error in diagnosis does not show a constitutional violation
  • distinguishing in a Rule 12 motion actions taken in response to constitutional claims raised in a prisoner’s letter versus an official’s mere receipt of a letter
  • deeming factual allegations contained in pro se plaintiff’s brief to “supplement” his pleading
  • “[T]o allow a mere letter to an official to 8 Defendants argue that Plaintiff’s service on Defendant Cuomo was improper. (Defs.’ Mem. at 8–9.
  • “[T]o allow a mere letter to an official to impose supervisory liability would permit a[] [plaintiff] to place liability on individuals who had no authority over the situation complained of merely by sending letters.”
  • “[I]t is well-established that an allegation that an official ignored a prisoner's letter of protest and request for investigation of allegations made therein is insufficient to hold that official liable for the alleged violations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gorenstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.