S.D. New York· 12/6/2002
Johnson v. Wright
Citations
- 234 F. Supp. 2d 352
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23462
- 2002 WL 31741268
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an error in diagnosis does not show a constitutional violation
- distinguishing in a Rule 12 motion actions taken in response to constitutional claims raised in a prisoner’s letter versus an official’s mere receipt of a letter
- deeming factual allegations contained in pro se plaintiff’s brief to “supplement” his pleading
- “[T]o allow a mere letter to an official to 8 Defendants argue that Plaintiff’s service on Defendant Cuomo was improper. (Defs.’ Mem. at 8–9.
- “[T]o allow a mere letter to an official to impose supervisory liability would permit a[] [plaintiff] to place liability on individuals who had no authority over the situation complained of merely by sending letters.”
- “[I]t is well-established that an allegation that an official ignored a prisoner's letter of protest and request for investigation of allegations made therein is insufficient to hold that official liable for the alleged violations.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gorenstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cusamano v. SobekN.D. New York· 2009-01-26· cited 141×
- Rodriguez-Garcia v. Municipality of CaguasFirst Circuit· 2007-07-31· cited 111×
- Rusyniak v. GensiniN.D. New York· 2009-05-05· cited 101×
- Vega v. ArtusN.D. New York· 2009-03-26· cited 85×
- Tafari v. McCarthyN.D. New York· 2010-05-24· cited 85×
- Johnson v. WrightSecond Circuit· 2005-06-24· cited 81×
- Alvarado v. Westchester CountyS.D. New York· 2014-04-24· cited 70×
- Kuck v. DanaherD. Connecticut· 2011-09-29· cited 62×
- Pugh v. GoordS.D. New York· 2008-07-31· cited 53×
- Atkins v. County of OrangeS.D. New York· 2003-03-14· cited 27×
- Lloyd v. City of New YorkS.D. New York· 2014-08-04· cited 18×
- Wade v. Tiffin Motorhomes, Inc.N.D. New York· 2009-10-27· cited 17×
- Bodie v. MorgenthauS.D. New York· 2004-09-23· cited 12×
- Bradley v. RELLN.D. New York· 2010-03-26· cited 9×
- Alexander v. WeinerD. Massachusetts· 2012-01-18· cited 7×
- Brooks v. BergN.D. New York· 2003-07-15· cited 5×
- Rosado v. AlameidaS.D. California· 2007-06-14· cited 4×
- Scheckells v. GoordS.D. New York· 2006-03-31· cited 4×
- Tatta v. WrightN.D. New York· 2007-10-10· cited 3×
- Domenech v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-07-05· cited 3×
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 28,443×
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 26,103×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court· 1988-06-20· cited 16,767×
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 8,748×
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 4,957×
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court· 1980-11-10· cited 3,527×
- Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court· 1991-12-16· cited 3,271×
- Cuoco v. MoritsuguSecond Circuit· 2000-07-28· cited 2,979×
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,725×
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court· 1997-03-31· cited 2,070×
- Edward E. Westlake v. William Lucas, Sheriff of Wayne CountySixth Circuit· 1976-07-29· cited 1,321×
- Huey B. Wright v. Harold Smith and Thomas A. Coughlin, IIISecond Circuit· 1994-04-06· cited 1,168×
- Gutierrez v. PetersSeventh Circuit· 1997-04-23· cited 877×
- Perkins v. Kansas Department of CorrectionsTenth Circuit· 1999-01-27· cited 821×
- Weyant v. OkstSecond Circuit· 1996-12-03· cited 808×
- Colon v. CoughlinSecond Circuit· 1995-06-28· cited 772×
- Chance v. ArmstrongSecond Circuit· 1998-05-07· cited 744×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.