D. Connecticut· 9/29/2011
Kuck v. Danaher
Citations
- 822 F. Supp. 2d 109
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111793
- 2011 WL 4537976
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that requests for injunctive relief cannot be directed to state officials sued in their individual capacities, as they would not have authority to provide such relief in those capacities
- finding that plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge a defendant's actions who did not cause plaintiffs' injury
- noting that a statute will survive an as-applied vagueness challenge “if the particular enforcement at issue is consistent with the core concerns underlying the statute .... ” (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted)
- observing \quasi-judicial immunity should only extend to claims against defendants sued in their individual and not official capacities\
- observing “quasi-judicial immunity should only extend to claims against defendants sued in their individual and not official capacities”
- finding that the plaintiffs “failed to plausibly allege” that a 12 The failure to oppose a motion for summary judgment on a certain claim is deemed abandonment of the claim. E.g., Feacher v. Intercontinental Hotels Grp., 563 F. Supp. 2d 389, 399 (N.D.N.Y. 2008
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bryant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hightower v. City of BostonFirst Circuit· 2012-08-30· cited 65×
- Chief of Police of the City of Worcester v. HoldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2015-03-11· cited 37×
- Caba v. WeaknechtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-02-04· cited 30×
- Nassau & Suffolk Cnty. Taxi Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. StateE.D. New York· 2018-09-28· cited 21×
- Komondy v. GiocoD. Connecticut· 2017-05-25· cited 17×
- Libertarian Party of Erie Cnty. v. CuomoW.D. New York· 2018-01-10· cited 17×
- United States v. SmithS.D. New York· 2014-04-04· cited 17×
- Pawlow v. Department of Emergency Services & Public ProtectionD. Connecticut· 2016-03-23· cited 10×
- Woollard v. SheridanD. Maryland· 2012-03-02· cited 10×
- United States v. LaheyS.D. New York· 2013-08-08· cited 6×
- DeVecchis v. ScaloraD. Connecticut· 2016-03-31· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. Ethan IsertMassachusetts Superior Court· 2024-01-02
Cites
80 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 14,197×
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court· 2009-01-21· cited 13,928×
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 11,385×
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-01-12· cited 6,373×
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 5,104×
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 3,694×
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court· 1978-06-29· cited 3,397×
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 3,286×
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 3,086×
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1988-01-12· cited 2,252×
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court· 2010-06-28· cited 2,024×
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Second Circuit· 2007-04-06· cited 1,966×
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 2000-06-28· cited 1,399×
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 1,379×
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court· 2008-03-18· cited 1,365×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.