Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 815 S.W.2d 707
  • 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 169
  • 1991 WL 117447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming murder conviction; fact-finder could reject sudden passion claim if it found no provocative conduct, no adequate case, or that defendant acted deliberately rather than in moment \incapable of cool reflection\
  • affirming murder conviction; fact-finder could reject sudden passion claim if it found no provocative conduct, no adequate case, or that defendant acted deliberately rather than in moment \incapable of cool reflection\
  • State offered evidence of history of abuse from which jury could find absence of sudden passion at time of offense
  • verbally taunting the accused was insufficient \adequate cause\ for sudden passion
  • verbally taunting the accused was insufficient “adequate cause” for sudden passion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Clinton, Overstreet, Campbell, Maloney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.