Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 6/13/2007
Johnson v. State
Citations
- 226 S.W.3d 439
- 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 772
- 2007 WL 1695323
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the applicable standard of review is one of abused discretion
- holding that the applicable standard of review is one of abused discretion
- holding that the applicable standard of review is one of abused discretion
- holding that the applicable standard of review is one of abused discretion
- holding that the applicable standard of review is one of abused discretion
- reasoning that calling 9-1-1 and asking for police assistance constituted implied consent for police to enter defendant’s home and investigate homicide
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cochran, Keller, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Johnson, Meyers, Price
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
79 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Valtierra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-05-05· cited 747×
- Luna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-10-29· cited 267×
- Meekins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-05-04· cited 232×
- State v. WeaverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-09-28· cited 153×
- Figueroa v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-04-14· cited 126×
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2017-06-07· cited 90×
- Rothstein v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-09-11· cited 69×
- State v. MoselyTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2011-08-30· cited 39×
- Ashton Joel Carmen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-06-30· cited 38×
- Cisneros v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-08-06· cited 34×
- Thomas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-09-15· cited 20×
- State v. Phillips.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2016-09-30· cited 15×
- French v. City of CaseyD. Colorado· 2019-01-09· cited 15×
- Jeffrey Earl Myrick v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2013-09-12· cited 12×
- David O. Meekins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2009-12-17· cited 10×
- Tollefson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2011-08-31· cited 9×
- Rodriguez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-12-03· cited 8×
- State v. Shirley CopelandTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2012-08-09· cited 7×
- Valtierra v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2009-11-04· cited 4×
- Pace v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2010-08-04· cited 3×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court· 2006-05-22· cited 2,237×
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 1,598×
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court· 1978-05-31· cited 1,386×
- Montanez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-04-26· cited 952×
- Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-11-13· cited 612×
- State v. KoedatichSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-08-03· cited 379×
- State v. FredetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1979-09-28· cited 64×
- State v. KoucoulesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1974-12-11· cited 58×
- State v. FlippoWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2002-11-27· cited 58×
- Steigler v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1971-02-16· cited 43×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-23· cited 39×
- State v. FleischmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-04-25· cited 18×
- Johnson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-03-03· cited 9×
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-04-11· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.