Johnson v. Johnson

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 1024

Syllabus

Trial court erred in a few discrete respects as to the final judgment regarding the parties' divorce. The trial court erred by failing to explain why it did not treat husband's claimed inheritance from an aunt as his separate property rather than as marital property, and by failing to classify wife's 2016 tax refund as a marital asset and husband's 2016 tax debt as a marital liability. In addition, the trial court made a mathematical error in calculating husband's expected future income, and does not appear to have credited husband for a claimed prior payment toward wife's attorney fees. Judgment reversed and matter remanded as to those limited issues judgment affirmed in all other respects.