Johnson v. Johnson

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 4085

Syllabus

The trial court exceeded the scope of our remand by imputing additional income to appellant, but the error was harmless because it did not affect appellant's support obligations. The trial court did not err in determining that appellant's inheritance was marital property. The trial court did err by ordering appellant to seek work, because the court did not have statutory authority to enter the seek-work order. The trial court also erred by ordering appellee to pay appellant his share of her tax refund, offset by her share of his tax debt. Judgment affirmed as modified.