Williams v. Williams
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 611
- 106 N.E.3d 317
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion by granting Defendant-appellee a one-half interest in a timeshare the parties acquired during the marriage, by granting Defendant-appellee a one-half interest in the Plaintiff-appellant's annuity pension benefit which was acquired during the marriage, and by ordering Plaintiff-appellant to pay Defendant-appellee's attorney fees. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Berish v. BerishOhio Supreme Court· 1982-02-19· cited 459×
- Hoyt v. HoytOhio Supreme Court· 1990-08-29· cited 287×
- Bisker v. BiskerOhio Supreme Court· 1994-07-27· cited 156×
- Kapadia v. KapadiaOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-05-12· cited 54×
- Janis v. JanisOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-07-29· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.