Skip to main content

Herman v. Herman

Citations

  • 201 N.E.3d 530
  • 2022 Ohio 4148

Syllabus

Competent, credible evidence supports the trial court's determination that appellee/cross-appellant did not transform her separate property into marital property by gifting appellant/cross-appellee an interest in the property. Competent, credible evidence supports the trial court's valuation of the parties' vehicle. Application of the law of the case doctrine overcome where mistake in a previous appellate decision on marital property was within concept of manifest injustice. Further, because deviation from the law of the case results in a change to the distribution of marital assets, the trial court is directed to revisit the issue of spousal support on remand. The trial court erred by failing to address certain videos and photographs in its final judgment entry.

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.