Louise J. Hamlet v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, because the plaintiff was employed “by appointment and not by contract,” the plaintiffs “breach of contract count d[id] not provide for a substantive right to money damages and [could not] provide jurisdiction under the Tucker Act”
• setting forth the test for determining whether an agency manual “is a regulation entitled to the force and effect of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).