Skip to main content
· 6/10/2004

Joel White v. John Lambert, Superintendent

Citations

  • 370 F.3d 1002
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 11427
  • 2004 WL 1276822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that section 2254 is the proper jurisdictional basis for a habeas petition 6 brought by an individual “in custody pursuant to a state court judgment.”
  • holding that section 2254 is the 4 proper jurisdictional basis for a habeas petition brought by an individual “in custody 5 pursuant to a state court judgment”
  • holding that Section 2254 was a state prisoner’s exclusive remedy when he sought to challenge his transfer from a state prison to a privately-run prison in another state
  • concluding “that § 2254 is the exclusive avenue for a state court prisoner to challenge the constitutionality of his detention[.]”
  • noting that Tenth Circuit is only circuit to permit use of § 2241 by state prisoners challenging the execution of their sentence and collecting contrary cases from other circuits
  • holding 27 § 2254 is the proper jurisdictional basis for a habeas petition brought by an individual “in 28 / / / 1 || custody pursuant to a state court judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noonan, Paez, Wardlaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.