· 5/3/2011
Tides v. the Boeing Co.
Citations
- 644 F.3d 809
- 32 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 129
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 8980
- 94 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,168
- 2011 WL 1651245
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “If the statutory language is ambiguous, . . . then we may refer to legislative history to discern congressional intent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kleinfeld, Tashima, Silverman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.