Eric v. Shelby v. James Bartlett, Warden Brian Superintendant of Oregon State Penitentiary, Superintendant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 2244's one-year limitation period applies to all 25 habeas petitions filed by persons in “custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court,” 26 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1
• holding that § 2244's one-year limitation period applies to all 24 habeas petitions filed by persons in “custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court,” 25 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1
• holding that § 2244’s one-year limitation period applies to all 27 Habeas Petitions filed by persons in “custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court,” 1 than a state court judgment
• the statute of limitations for a 26 petition challenging parole denial begins to run on the date after that administrative decision 27 becomes final
• limitations period began to run the day after he received timely notice of the denial 8 || of his administrative appeal challenging disciplinary decision
• § 2244 one-year limitations period applies to habeas petition challenging administrative decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).