Jimenez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding State's comment on evidence during closing argument without expressing personal opinion was not misconduct
• because guilty verdict was affirmed on appeal, defense counsel was not entitled to argue capital defendant’s innocence during new penalty hearing
• because guilty verdict was affirmed on appeal, defense counsel was not entitled to argue capital defendant's innocence during new penalty hearing
• implicitly providing that the use of the pronoun \I\ does not render a statement personal opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Evans v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2001-07-24· cited 144×
• Lord v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 109×
• Greene v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1997-01-04· cited 71×
• McKenna v. McDaniel
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-09-15· cited 64×
• Jimenez v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1996-05-30· cited 51×
• Libby v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-09-09· cited 41×
• Pertgen v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1994-05-31· cited 27×
• Bennett v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1995-08-24· cited 25×
• Smith v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1994-09-28· cited 16×
• Beets v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1991-12-20· cited 15×
• Moore v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2000-03-10· cited 5×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-09-15
• Burns (David) Vs. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2020-01-23
• Granados (Richard) Vs. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2020-06-25
• Holman (Jerry) Vs. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2020-09-18