Nevada Supreme Court· 9/28/1994
Roberts v. State
Citations
- 881 P.2d 1
- 110 Nev. 1121
- 1994 Nev. LEXIS 135
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- relying on state due-process guarantee in adhering to different materiality tests for Brady claims depending on whether there was a specific request, despite contrary Supreme Court decisions
- relying on state due process guarantee in adhering to different materiality tests for Brady claims depending on whether there was a specific request, despite contrary Supreme Court decisions
- prosecutor must disclose to defendant favorable Brady material in the possession of the police department
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mazzan v. Warden, Ely State PrisonNevada Supreme Court· 2000-01-27· cited 110×
- Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-11-18· cited 104×
- State v. HueblerNevada Supreme Court· 2012-04-26· cited 99×
- Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-10-01· cited 64×
- Jimenez v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-05-30· cited 51×
- Lisle v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-04-24· cited 50×
- Wyman v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2009-10-08· cited 47×
- Homick v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-04-03· cited 12×
- Wade v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1999-10-11· cited 9×
- Schlafer v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1999-06-16· cited 1×
- Yandell (Timothy) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2020-07-27
- Decker v. DavisCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2007-02-28
- ANSELMO (MICHAEL) v. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2022-03-10
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-01-24· cited 445×
- People v. VilardiNew York Court of Appeals· 1990-05-10· cited 295×
- State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court· 1988-05-18· cited 273×
- Engberg v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court· 1991-10-17· cited 84×
- O'RARDEN v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1989-12-20· cited 78×
- Hughes Anderson Bagley v. Walter T. LumpkinNinth Circuit· 1986-09-02· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. GallarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-01-12· cited 49×
- State v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-06-19· cited 33×
- People v. RaessAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-08-01· cited 32×
- State v. BrissonSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1993-02-04· cited 25×
- Shrader v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1985-09-24· cited 23×
- People v. PerezAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-01-30· cited 23×
- State v. DietrichLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1990-06-26· cited 15×
- Hubbard v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1980-10-27· cited 10×
- People v. OrtizAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-05-08· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.