Court of Appeals of Maryland· 11/18/1997

Ware v. State

Citations

702 A.2d 699
348 Md. 19
1997 Md. LEXIS 566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a defendant is not entitled to a requested instruction where the instruction conflicts with the mandate of Art. 27, § 413(i)
holding that a defendant is not entitled to a requested instruction where the instruction conflicts with the mandate of Art. 27, § 413(f)
recognizing that evidence of a plea agreement between the State and a witness is \powerful impeachment evidence\ that \enables a defendant to attack the motive or bias of a witness ....\ and must be disclosed to the accused
recognizing that evidence of a plea agreement between the State and a witness is “powerful impeachment evidence” that “enables a defendant to attack the motive or bias of a witness .... ” and must be disclosed to the accused
stating that the necessary inquiry is \whether the defendant knew or should have known facts that would have allowed him to access the undisclosed evidence\
stating that the necessary inquiry is “whether the defendant knew or should have known facts that would have allowed him to access the undisclosed evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Raker, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.