Ninth Circuit· 12/24/2008
JG v. Douglas County School District
Citations
- 552 F.3d 786
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26389
- 2008 WL 5377696
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that courts “consider the IEP at the time of its implementation, not in hindsight”
- concluding that a district’s circulation of draft proposals prior to IEP discussions does not, without some other evidence, amount to a “take it or leave it” position
- concluding 13 that a state statutory timeline of 45 school days between consent and evaluation “is not an 14 inconsistent interpretation of [the] IDEA’s reasonable timeliness requirement”
- “Determining whether a student has autism requires many assessments and takes a good deal of time.”
- relying on Alcaraz v. INS, 384 F.3d 1150, 1161 (9th Cir. 2004)
- noting additional briefing is appropriate when new evidence is 12 presented
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Scannlain, Gould, Bea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lahoti v. VeriCheck, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2009-11-16· cited 107×
- Daniel Chavez v. David RobinsonNinth Circuit· 2016-03-29· cited 105×
- Anchorage School District v. M.P.Ninth Circuit· 2012-07-19· cited 59×
- J.L. v. Mercer Island School DistrictNinth Circuit· 2010-01-13· cited 57×
- Garcia v. BiterE.D. California· 2016-07-18· cited 46×
- Mark Oyama v. University of HawaiiNinth Circuit· 2015-12-29· cited 33×
- L.J. ex rel. Hudson v. Pittsburg Unified School DistrictNinth Circuit· 2016-09-01· cited 30×
- Layna Crofts v. Issaquah School DistrictNinth Circuit· 2022-01-12· cited 7×
- J.L. v. Mercer Island School DistrictNinth Circuit· 2009-08-06· cited 6×
- D.O. v. Escondido Union School Dist.Ninth Circuit· 2023-01-31· cited 6×
- Jaccari J. v. Board of Education, District No. 299N.D. Illinois· 2010-02-23· cited 5×
- J.P. v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court· 2011-09-16· cited 5×
- TRACY N. v. Department of Educ., HawaiiD. Hawaii· 2010-05-21· cited 5×
- B.H. v. Manhattan Beach Unified Sch. Dist.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-05-20· cited 5×
- Miller v. Monroe School DistrictW.D. Washington· 2015-09-17· cited 4×
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Department of TransportationNinth Circuit· 2014-10-30· cited 3×
- Tamalpais Union High School District v. D. W.N.D. California· 2017-09-21· cited 2×
- D.R. Ex Rel. Etsuko R. v. Department of EducationD. Hawaii· 2011-10-21· cited 1×
- Department of Education v. M.F. ex rel. R.F.D. Hawaii· 2011-12-29· cited 1×
- Ravenswood City School District v. J.S.N.D. California· 2012-03-30· cited 1×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 4,567×
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court· 1982-06-28· cited 2,878×
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 1,566×
- Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-10-31· cited 799×
- Provenz v. MillerNinth Circuit· 1996-09-11· cited 384×
- Amanda J., a Minor, by and Through Her Guardian Ad Litem, Annette J. v. Clark County School District, and Nevada State Department of EducationNinth Circuit· 2001-09-25· cited 215×
- Paul E. Black v. Tic Investment Corp. Stratton Georgoulis, Individually and James H. Slife, IndividuallySeventh Circuit· 1990-04-18· cited 214×
- Gregory K., a Student of the Longview School District v. Longview School DistrictNinth Circuit· 1987-03-03· cited 197×
- W.G. B.G., Individually and as Parents of R.G., a Minor v. Board of Trustees of Target Range School District No. 23, Missoula, MontanaNinth Circuit· 1992-04-07· cited 174×
- Rattlesnake Coalition v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyNinth Circuit· 2007-12-07· cited 164×
- Francisco Alcaraz Leticia Cardenas Alcaraz v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 2004-10-01· cited 156×
- Mark H. Ex Rel. Michelle H. v. LemahieuNinth Circuit· 2008-01-17· cited 147×
- Van Duyn Ex Rel. Van Duyn v. Baker School District 5JNinth Circuit· 2007-09-06· cited 109×
- USA Petroleum Company v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyNinth Circuit· 1994-01-06· cited 107×
- Lukhard v. ReedSupreme Court· 1987-04-22· cited 103×
- R.B. Ex Rel. F.B. v. Napa Valley Unified School DistrictNinth Circuit· 2007-07-16· cited 96×
- Nb v. Hellgate Elementary School Dist. Ex Rel. Board of DirectorsNinth Circuit· 2008-09-04· cited 83×
- Coleman v. Newburgh Enlarged City School DistrictSecond Circuit· 2007-09-25· cited 76×
- Golden Gate Hotel Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoNinth Circuit· 1994-03-18· cited 69×
- Ms. S., for Herself and on Behalf of Her Daughter G. v. Vashon Island School District Office of Superintendent of Public InstructionNinth Circuit· 2003-07-31· cited 66×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.