Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 12/24/2008

JG v. Douglas County School District

Citations

  • 552 F.3d 786
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26389
  • 2008 WL 5377696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that courts “consider the IEP at the time of its implementation, not in hindsight”
  • concluding that a district’s circulation of draft proposals prior to IEP discussions does not, without some other evidence, amount to a “take it or leave it” position
  • concluding 13 that a state statutory timeline of 45 school days between consent and evaluation “is not an 14 inconsistent interpretation of [the] IDEA’s reasonable timeliness requirement”
  • “Determining whether a student has autism requires many assessments and takes a good deal of time.”
  • relying on Alcaraz v. INS, 384 F.3d 1150, 1161 (9th Cir. 2004)
  • noting additional briefing is appropriate when new evidence is 12 presented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Scannlain, Gould, Bea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.