· 7/16/2007
R.B. Ex Rel. F.B. v. Napa Valley Unified School District
Citations
- 496 F.3d 932
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 16840
- 2007 WL 2028132
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that a procedural violation alone “cannot qualify an otherwise ineligible student for IDEA relief”
- collecting cases and drawing distinction between cases involving eligible students and those seeking to establish eligibility
- findings are thorough and careful “when the officer 21 participates in the questioning of witnesses and writes a decision containing a complete factual 22 background as well as a discrete analysis supporting the ultimate conclusions”
- the amount of deference accorded the hearing officer’s findings increase where the M.M. V. LAFAYETTE SCH. DIST. 31 officer is “thorough and careful”
- the amount of deference accorded the hearing officer’s findings increase where the officer is “thorough and careful”
- the amount of deference accorded the hearing officer’s findings increase where the officer is “thorough and careful”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, O'Scannlain, Gonzalez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.