Skip to main content
· 7/16/2007

R.B. Ex Rel. F.B. v. Napa Valley Unified School District

Citations

  • 496 F.3d 932
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 16840
  • 2007 WL 2028132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that a procedural violation alone “cannot qualify an otherwise ineligible student for IDEA relief”
  • collecting cases and drawing distinction between cases involving eligible students and those seeking to establish eligibility
  • findings are thorough and careful “when the officer 21 participates in the questioning of witnesses and writes a decision containing a complete factual 22 background as well as a discrete analysis supporting the ultimate conclusions”
  • the amount of deference accorded the hearing officer’s findings increase where the M.M. V. LAFAYETTE SCH. DIST. 31 officer is “thorough and careful”
  • the amount of deference accorded the hearing officer’s findings increase where the officer is “thorough and careful”
  • the amount of deference accorded the hearing officer’s findings increase where the officer is “thorough and careful”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, O'Scannlain, Gonzalez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.