W.G. B.G., Individually and as Parents of R.G., a Minor v. Board of Trustees of Target Range School District No. 23, Missoula, Montana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that parents were \not barred as a matter of equity from recovering\ reimbursement of private tutoring expenses because the school's proposed public placement violated the IDEA
• noting that parents were “not barred as a matter of equity from recovering” reimbursement of private tutoring expenses because the school’s proposed public placement violated the IDEA
• affirming the district court's ruling that the school district's development of an IEP without the involvement of the student's parents deprived the student of a FAPE
• “State standards that are not inconsistent with federal standards [under IDEA] are also enforceable in federal court.”
• “State standards that are not inconsistent with federal standards [under IDEA] are also enforceable in federal court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).