Paul E. Black v. Tic Investment Corp. Stratton Georgoulis, Individually and James H. Slife, Individually

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing an estoppel claim but only in claims for benefits under an unfunded single-employer welfare benefits plans
• “Where new evidence is presented in a reply to a motion for summary judgment, the district court should not consider the new evidence without giving the movant an opportunity to respond.”
• “We hold, therefore, that estoppel principles are applicable to claims for benefits under unfunded single-employer welfare benefit plans under ERISA. We express no opinion as to the application of estoppel principles in other situations.”
• “Where new evidence is presented in a reply to a No. 19-1452 15 motion for summary judgment, the district court should not consider the new evidence without giving the movant an op- portunity to respond.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).