Skip to main content
· 7/3/2003

Jernigan v. Langley

Citations

  • 111 S.W.3d 153
  • 46 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1010
  • 2003 Tex. LEXIS 116
  • 2003 WL 21512656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that physician who waited 600 days after receiving expert report to move for dismissal did not waive his right to pursue motion to dismiss under former version of health care liability statute
  • holding that physician who waited 600 days after receiving expert report to move for dismissal did not waive his right to pursue a motion to dismiss under former version of the health care liability statute
  • holding that physician who waited 600 days after receiving expert report to move for dismissal did not waive his right to pursue a motion to dismiss under former version of the health care liability statute
  • holding that physician who waited 600 days after receiving expert report to move for dismissal did not waive his right to pursue motion to dismiss under former version of health care liability statute
  • holding that physician who waited 600 days after receiving expert report to move for dismissal did not waive his right to pursue a motion to dismiss under former version of the health care liability statute
  • holding that physician who waited 600 days after receiving expert report to move for dismissal did not waive his right to pursue a motion to dismiss under former version of the health care liability statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.