Texas Supreme Court· 6/9/2006

Jernigan v. Langley

Citations

195 S.W.3d 91
49 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 717
2006 Tex. LEXIS 544
2006 WL 1562878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a passing reference to the fact that the patient's case was \discussed\ with the defendant physician \does not identify with specificity any action or inaction by [the defendant] that breached the applicable standard of care\
stating that report that only mentioned defendant physician in passing was no report as to that defendant
stating that a mere “passing reference” to a physician in a report, without explanation of how the physician breached the standard of care or caused the injury, would not constitute a sufficient report
affirming trial court’s dismissal of suit because expert reports omitted any allegation about how doctor breached standard of care and causation
stating that expert report “need not marshal every bit of the plaintiff’s evidence” but must provide a “fair summary” of expert’s opinion on standard of care, breach of that standard of care, causation, and harm
stating that expert report A need not marshal every bit of the plaintiff = s evidence @ but must provide a A fair summary @ of expert = s opinion on standard of care, breach of that standard of care, causation, and harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

258 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.