Crosstex Energy Services, L.P. v. Pro Plus, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no waiver existed where a party filed an answer, exchanged 11,000 pages of written discovery, and entered into a Rule 1-1 agreement, among other actions
• holding that certificate of merit is a mandatory, but non-jurisdictional, filing requirement
• holding it does not follow that creation of procedural bar means legislature wanted judgment attacked in perpetuity
• holding consequences that result from each possible interpretation is factor for determining whether statute is jurisdictional
• holding presence or absence of specific consequences for noncompliance is factor for determining whether statute is jurisdictional
• holding it does not follow that creation of procedural bar means legislature wanted judgment attacked in perpetuity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).