Hansen v. Starr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that expert executing report must demonstrate qualifications \within the document itself\
• explaining we “consider what was before the trial court at the time it made its decision”
• explaining we “consider what was before the trial court at the time it made its decision”
• stating that expert must show qualifications in report
• “Because MacGre-gor’s report does not show that he is qualified as an expert in the area of radiology, the trial court could have concluded the report did not represent a good faith effort to comply with the statutory requirements for an expert report.”
• “Because MacGregor’s report does not show that he is qualified as an expert in the area of radiology, the trial court could have concluded the report did not represent a good faith effort to comply with the statutory requirements for an expert report.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).