Fernandes v. Portwine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the superior court's decision not to designate a prevailing party was \reasonable\ and therefore not an abuse of discretion where both parties \prevailed on some issues and lost on others\
• affirming trial court's decision that neither litigant was the prevailing party for Rule 82 purposes
• upholding superior court's decision not to designate a prevailing party or award monetary damages to either party
• offering to have judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs, but also providing for dismissal of counterclaims
• clear and convincing standard does not apply to general tort nuisance
• “Preponderance of the evidence is the general burden of persuasion in civil cases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).