Alaska Supreme Court· 11/9/2007
Thomas v. Thomas
Citations
- 171 P.3d 98
- 2007 Alas. LEXIS 152
- 2007 WL 3317674
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that children's testimony appeared to be \swayed by [their father's] influence\ and remanding for superior court to consider whether older children's preference to live with their father was improperly influenced by their father
- \We give the superior court broad discretion to determine custody awards in a divorce proceeding so long as the determination is in a child's best interests.\
- “Separate property can become marital property where that is the intent of the owner and there is an act or acts which demonstrate that intent.” (quoting Chotiner v. Chotiner, 829 P.2d 829, 832 (Alaska 1992))
- \Separate property can become marital property where that is the intent of the owner and there is an act or acts which demonstrate that intent.\ (emphasis added) (quoting Chotiner v. Chotiner , 829 P.2d 829 , 832 (Alaska 1992) )
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Piazza v. KellimOregon Supreme Court· 2016-07-21· cited 62×
- Sheffield v. SheffieldAlaska Supreme Court· 2011-12-09· cited 47×
- Peterson v. SwarthoutAlaska Supreme Court· 2009-08-14· cited 41×
- Stephanie F. v. George C.Alaska Supreme Court· 2012-01-20· cited 36×
- Wells v. BarileAlaska Supreme Court· 2015-10-16· cited 31×
- Parks v. ParksAlaska Supreme Court· 2009-08-07· cited 29×
- Sarah D. v. John D.Alaska Supreme Court· 2015-06-12· cited 24×
- Kessler v. KesslerAlaska Supreme Court· 2018-02-16· cited 24×
- Riggs v. CoonradtAlaska Supreme Court· 2014-10-16· cited 20×
- Caroline J. v. Theodore J.Alaska Supreme Court· 2015-08-28· cited 18×
- Brennan v. BrennanAlaska Supreme Court· 2018-08-10· cited 17×
- Littleton v. BanksAlaska Supreme Court· 2008-09-12· cited 7×
- Hall v. HallAlaska Supreme Court· 2018-09-14· cited 6×
- Weinberger v. WeinmeisterAlaska Supreme Court· 2012-01-20· cited 4×
- Orville Wesley Jenkins Layton v. Mary Tabitha O'Dea, f/k/a Mary Tabitha O-Dea-LaytonAlaska Supreme Court· 2022-08-12· cited 4×
- Laura J. O'Brien v. Francis X. Delaplain, Kassandra Spencer, Kenneth M. O'Brien, Willis A. Ehlers, and the Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court· 2024-09-27· cited 4×
- Misyura v. MisyuraAlaska Supreme Court· 2010-11-19· cited 3×
- Oscar M., a Minor v. Marilyn P. and Shawn M.Alaska Supreme Court· 2024-08-30
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Borchgrevink v. BorchgrevinkAlaska Supreme Court· 1997-06-27· cited 97×
- Jenkins v. HandelAlaska Supreme Court· 2000-10-13· cited 75×
- Veazey v. VeazeyAlaska Supreme Court· 1977-02-16· cited 67×
- Whitesides v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-04-13· cited 54×
- Fardig v. FardigAlaska Supreme Court· 2002-10-04· cited 54×
- Chotiner v. ChotinerAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-04-03· cited 50×
- Deivert v. OseiraAlaska Supreme Court· 1981-05-22· cited 49×
- Virgin v. VirginAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-11-05· cited 40×
- Rooney v. RooneyAlaska Supreme Court· 1996-04-12· cited 34×
- Park v. ParkAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-09-03· cited 31×
- Lacy v. LacyAlaska Supreme Court· 1976-08-20· cited 30×
- Elton H. v. Naomi R.Alaska Supreme Court· 2005-08-26· cited 29×
- Martin v. MartinAlaska Supreme Court· 2002-07-19· cited 26×
- North Pacific Processors, Inc. v. City & Borough of YakutatAlaska Supreme Court· 2005-06-29· cited 23×
- Melendrez v. MelendrezAlaska Supreme Court· 2006-09-15· cited 18×
- Carter v. NovotnyAlaska Supreme Court· 1989-10-09· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.