Skip to main content

Millette v. Millette

Citations

  • 177 P.3d 258
  • 2008 Alas. LEXIS 2
  • 2008 WL 54204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that superior court was in best position to make factual determination because it required assessing credibility and each party's testimony
  • explaining that issues are waived for purposes of appeal if not adequately raised below
  • holding issue waived when “[b]y proceeding through almost the entire . . . hearing without mention of his motion to compel, [the plaintiff] did not sufficiently bring the issue to the superior court’s attention”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Millette v. Millette

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.