· 8/2/2012
Jathoul v. Clinton
Citations
- 880 F. Supp. 2d 168
- 2012 WL 3126773
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107968
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “While it may well be true that exclusion of her husband imposes burdens on their married life, the Court cannot find any constitutional violation.”
- “‘[T]he [p]laintiff’s factual allegations in the complaint . . . will bear closer scrutiny in resolving a 12(b)(1) motion’ than in resolving a 12(b)(6) motion for failure to state a claim.”
- “A court has an ‘affirmative obligation to ensure that it is acting within the scope of its jurisdictional authority.’ For this reason, ‘the [p]laintiff’s factual allegations in the complaint . . . will bear closer scrutiny in resolving a 12(b)(1
- “[T]his Court is bound by Swartz[,] . . . which found no violation of a wife’s constitutionally protected liberty interest in her marriage when her 14 husband was deported because ‘deportation would not in any way destroy the legal union . . . .’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.