District of Columbia· 8/2/2012
Jathoul v. Clinton
Citations
- 880 F. Supp. 2d 168
- 2012 WL 3126773
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107968
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “While it may well be true that exclusion of her husband imposes burdens on their married life, the Court cannot find any constitutional violation.”
- “‘[T]he [p]laintiff’s factual allegations in the complaint . . . will bear closer scrutiny in resolving a 12(b)(1) motion’ than in resolving a 12(b)(6) motion for failure to state a claim.”
- “A court has an ‘affirmative obligation to ensure that it is acting within the scope of its jurisdictional authority.’ For this reason, ‘the [p]laintiff’s factual allegations in the complaint . . . will bear closer scrutiny in resolving a 12(b)(1
- “[T]his Court is bound by Swartz[,] . . . which found no violation of a wife’s constitutionally protected liberty interest in her marriage when her 14 husband was deported because ‘deportation would not in any way destroy the legal union . . . .’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Baan Rao Thai Restaurant v. Michael PompeoD.C. Circuit· 2021-01-22· cited 128×
- Jafarzadeh v. NielsenD.C. Circuit· 2018-08-06· cited 25×
- Udugampola v. JacobsDistrict of Columbia· 2014-09-29· cited 6×
- Jafarzadeh v. DukeDistrict of Columbia· 2018-08-06
- Rohrbaugh v. PompeoDistrict of Columbia· 2019-08-22
- Aboutalebi v. Department of StateDistrict of Columbia· 2019-12-18
- Didban v. PompeoDistrict of Columbia· 2020-01-15
- Freedom Watch, Inc. v. McAleenanDistrict of Columbia· 2020-02-26
- Zandieh v. PompeoDistrict of Columbia· 2020-07-29
- Carmichael v. PompeoDistrict of Columbia· 2020-08-28
- Schwartz v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict of Columbia· 2021-09-10
- Clean Label Project Foundation v. Garden of Life, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2021-09-23
- Colindres v. U.S. Department of StateDistrict of Columbia· 2021-12-14
- Neupane Mahmood v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict of Columbia· 2021-12-20
- Carmichael v. PompeoDistrict of Columbia· 2022-03-25
- Torres v. KerryS.D. California· 2013-04-04
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 9,423×
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court· 1993-03-03· cited 2,968×
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court· 2005-04-19· cited 2,236×
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncD.C. Circuit· 2000-06-27· cited 1,335×
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2005-04-08· cited 1,308×
- Trudeau v. Federal Trade CommissionD.C. Circuit· 2006-07-28· cited 1,112×
- Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 952×
- Frank A. Schuler, Jr. v. United States of America, Department of StateD.C. Circuit· 1979-09-07· cited 925×
- Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police v. AshcroftDistrict of Columbia· 2001-08-14· cited 854×
- Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court· 1951-10-15· cited 849×
- United States Ex Rel. Knauff v. ShaughnessySupreme Court· 1950-02-06· cited 577×
- US Ecology, Inc. v. United States Department of the InteriorD.C. Circuit· 2000-11-14· cited 288×
- Bangura v. HansenSixth Circuit· 2006-01-18· cited 244×
- Roberto Saavedra Bruno,appellants v. Madeleine K. Albright, Secretary of State,appelleesD.C. Circuit· 1999-12-03· cited 239×
- Abourezk v. ReaganD.C. Circuit· 1986-03-11· cited 175×
- Dunn & Black, P.S. v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2007-07-11· cited 97×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.