Skip to main content
· 7/11/2007

Dunn & Black, P.S. v. United States

Citations

  • 492 F.3d 1084
  • 100 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5170
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 16390
  • 2007 WL 1989364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the doctrine of sovereign immunity “is an important limitation on the subject matter jurisdiction of federal courts”
  • stating that failure to timely file an administrative claim with the IRS 6 divests the district court of jurisdiction over the claim
  • stating that district court is divested of jurisdiction if taxpayer fails to file an administrative refund claim
  • stating that a district court is divested of jurisdiction if taxpayer fails to file a formal administrative refund claim
  • reaching a similar conclusion that the Tucker Act’s administrative-exhaustion requirement is a prerequisite to finding a waiver of sovereign immunity
  • noting sovereign immunity is a limitation on the court's subject matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Scannlain, Tashima, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.