Fifth Circuit· 10/27/2021
Jaco v. Garland
Citations
- 24 F.4th 395
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that remand of similar claim would be futile where “the record reflects that the government was responsive to [petitioner’s] fears when apprised of them”
- holding that the group “Honduran women unable to leave their relationships” was not “sufficiently particularized”
- holding that a PSG’s “immutable characteristics must make the group sufficiently particularized and socially distinct without reference to the very persecution from which its members flee”
- holding that a PSG “must exist independent of the persecution claimed”
- concluding that a remand was “inappropriate because it would be futile”
- holding PSG consisting of “Honduran women who are unable to leave their domestic relationships” lacks particularity and social distinction and is inherently circular
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Munoz-De Zalaya v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2023-09-12· cited 55×
- Lopez-Perez v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2022-06-01· cited 35×
- Sanchez-Amador v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2022-04-11· cited 27×
- Espinoza-Ochoa v. GarlandFirst Circuit· 2023-12-27· cited 27×
- Bertrand v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2022-06-03· cited 16×
- United States v. CooperFifth Circuit· 2022-06-22· cited 6×
- N. v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2024-07-25· cited 4×
- K-E-S-GBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2025-07-18· cited 4×
- Bustamante-Leiva v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2024-04-19
- Elizabeth Cristales-de Linares v. Pamela BondiSixth Circuit· 2025-12-01
- Silva de Santiago v. BondiFifth Circuit· 2025-12-04
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 1,703×
- M-E-V-GBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2014-07-01· cited 1,009×
- Efe v. AshcroftFifth Circuit· 2002-06-20· cited 645×
- Wang v. HolderFifth Circuit· 2009-06-02· cited 631×
- Yu Zhao v. GonzalesFifth Circuit· 2005-03-16· cited 611×
- Jose Orellana-Monson v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 2012-06-25· cited 581×
- Hekmat Wadih Mikhael v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceFifth Circuit· 1997-06-04· cited 479×
- Bernard Lukwago A/K/A Melvin Haft v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesThird Circuit· 2003-05-14· cited 474×
- W-G-RBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2014-07-01· cited 359×
- A-BBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2018-07-01· cited 277×
- State of Texas v. USAFifth Circuit· 2015-11-25· cited 275×
- United States v. WilkesFifth Circuit· 1994-05-16· cited 268×
- United States v. AlvarezFifth Circuit· 2000-04-14· cited 238×
- Shaikh v. HolderFifth Circuit· 2009-11-19· cited 213×
- A-M-E & J-G-UBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2007-07-01· cited 201×
- Maria Gonzales-Veliz v. William Barr, U. S. Atty GFifth Circuit· 2019-09-10· cited 186×
- J-B-N- & S-MBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2007-07-01· cited 165×
- Chambers v. MukaseyFifth Circuit· 2008-03-07· cited 137×
- W-Y-C-& H-O-BBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2018-07-01· cited 129×
- Vitore Rreshpja v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesSixth Circuit· 2005-08-15· cited 125×
Other cases named Jaco v. Garland
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.