Lopez-Perez v. Garland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that petitioner who failed to brief an argument forfeited it
• noting that our court “will not remand if doing so will be futile”
• observing “Salvadoran women who are viewed as property by virtue of their position in a domestic relationship” not legally-cognizable PSG because it was impermissibly circular
• observing “Salvadoran women who are viewed as property by virtue of their position in a domestic relationship” not legally-cognizable PSG because it was impermissibly circular
• upholding the IJ’s decision and declining to remand because it would be futile
• “[Petitioner] does not brief any CAT- specific arguments on appeal, so that issue is forfeited.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Lopez-Perez v. Garland

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Lopez-Perez v. Garland
  First Circuit· 2022-02-22· cited 11×