Skip to main content

Cunningham v. State

Citations

  • 575 P.2d 936
  • 94 Nev. 128
  • 1978 Nev. LEXIS 502

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that contentions unsupported by legal authority need not be considered on appeal
  • holding that contentions unsupported by legal authority need not be considered on appeal
  • acknowledging that scope and manner of voir dire falls within the district court's sound discretion and that discretion is afforded considerable latitude on review
  • declining to entertain novel propositions of law unsupported by relevant authority
  • declining to entertain novel propositions of law unsupported by relevant authority
  • the scope of voir dire examination is within the sound discretion of the district court and the court’s determination is accorded considerable latitude on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.