Moore, Ex Parte Darron T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when a defendant affirmatively asserts during trial that he has “no objection” to the admission of evidence, he waives any error in its admission despite a pre-trial ruling denying his motion to suppress
• noting that Strickland requires the defendant to establish both prongs of an ineffective assistance claim, deficient performance and prejudice sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome, by a preponderance of the evidence in order to prevail
• “[T]o demonstrate harm in this case, Applicant must show that he would likely have been successful on appeal had the issue been properly preserved, that is, that the trial court’s denial of Applicant’s motion to suppress was an abuse of discretion.”
• trial court is the sole judge of credibility of witnesses
• ineffective assistance of counsel claims cognizable on habeas review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).