Court of Appeals of Virginia· 5/5/1992
Jackson v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 417 S.E.2d 5
- 14 Va. App. 414
- 8 Va. Law Rep. 2934
- 1992 Va. App. LEXIS 298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he primary function of Rule 5A:18 is to alert the trial judge to possible error so the judge may consider the issue intelligently and take corrective actions necessary.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Willis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 1,818×
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 963×
- Minnick v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1990-12-03· cited 848×
- People v. BingNew York Court of Appeals· 1990-07-02· cited 541×
- People v. BartolomeoNew York Court of Appeals· 1981-06-16· cited 294×
- Frye v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1986-06-13· cited 272×
- People v. SpellmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-12-13· cited 9×
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-03-08· cited 5×
- People v. BaptisteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-04-23· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.