Commonwealth v. Accardi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “135 days in segregation―absent any atypical conditions related to confinement―does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment”
• holding that “135 days in segregation -- absent any atypical conditions related to confinement -- does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment”
• stating that “135 days in segregation—absent any atypical conditions related to confinement—does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment”
• stating that “135 days in segregation—absent any atypical conditions related to confinement—does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment”
• stating that “135 days in segregation—absent any atypical conditions related to confinement—does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment”
• stating that “135 days in segregation—absent any atypical conditions related to confinement—does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).