Seventh Circuit· 8/17/2016
Jackson v. Blitt & Gaines, P.C.
Citations
- 833 F.3d 860
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15129
- 2016 WL 4376514
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the garnishment action does not compel action from the judgment-debtor
- “As with all questions of statutory interpretation, we start with the text of the statute to ascertain its plain meaning.”
- “As with all questions of statutory interpretation, we start with the text of the statute to ascertain its plain meaning.”
- Newsom was “good law in this circuit” before it was overruled
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bruce, Kanne, Rovner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Berger v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nSeventh Circuit· 2016-12-05· cited 278×
- Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College of IndianaSeventh Circuit· 2017-04-04· cited 143×
- Laura Zuniga v. Pierce and AssociatesSeventh Circuit· 2017-02-17· cited 82×
- Right Field Rooftops, LLC v. Chicago Cubs Baseball Club, LLCSeventh Circuit· 2017-09-01· cited 56×
- United States v. Keith MelvinSeventh Circuit· 2020-01-24· cited 50×
- Loja v. Main St. Acquisition Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2018-10-18· cited 39×
- City of Chicago v. SessionsN.D. Illinois· 2017-09-15· cited 22×
- Oliva v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLCSeventh Circuit· 2017-07-24· cited 11×
- Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2017-05-08· cited 7×
- Gary Jet Center, Inc. v. AFCO AvPORTS Management, LLCSeventh Circuit· 2017-07-13· cited 4×
- Reiber v. MathewN.D. Indiana· 2017-09-25· cited 3×
- Randall v. Maxwell & Morgan, P.C.D. Arizona· 2018-07-25· cited 3×
- United States v. TollefsonE.D. Wisconsin· 2019-02-15· cited 2×
- Milsap v. Habitat Co. LLCSeventh Circuit· 2018-01-18· cited 2×
- Wisconsin Central Limited v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2017-05-08
- Mario Loja v. Main Street Acquisition Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2018-10-18
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Tamayo v. BlagojevichSeventh Circuit· 2008-05-27· cited 1,583×
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-11-27· cited 1,399×
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court· 1988-05-31· cited 1,097×
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-05-21· cited 871×
- Reynolds v. CB Sports Bar, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2010-10-22· cited 330×
- Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court· 2014-01-27· cited 263×
- Aaron Fox Toni Fox, Husband and Wife v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc., a South Dakota Corporation Jerold Kaplan Jane Doe Kaplan, Husband and WifeNinth Circuit· 1994-02-01· cited 196×
- Wayne Soignier v. American Board of Plastic SurgerySeventh Circuit· 1996-09-19· cited 97×
- S & M Investment Co., a California General Partnership v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, a Public Entity, Does I Through Xxx, InclusiveNinth Circuit· 1990-08-15· cited 59×
- Dawn M. Newsom, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lawrence FriedmanSeventh Circuit· 1996-02-05· cited 59×
- Mark Suesz v. Med-1 Solutions, LLCSeventh Circuit· 2014-07-02· cited 52×
- Greg Hageman v. Dennis Barton, IIIEighth Circuit· 2016-03-29· cited 50×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Applicant-Appellee v. Sidley Austin Brown & WoodSeventh Circuit· 2002-10-24· cited 42×
- Carter v. AMC, LLCSeventh Circuit· 2011-05-13· cited 34×
- Smith v. Solomon and Solomon, P.C.First Circuit· 2013-04-24· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.