First Circuit· 4/24/2013
Smith v. Solomon and Solomon, P.C.
Citations
- 714 F.3d 73
- 2013 WL 1749593
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 8329
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a Massachusetts garnishment action is not \against\ a judgment-debtor but instead is against the garnishee
- finding that the judgment-debtor is not compelled to defend themselves in a garnishment action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, Souter, Stahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Greg Hageman v. Dennis Barton, IIIEighth Circuit· 2016-03-29· cited 50×
- Jackson v. Blitt & Gaines, P.C.Seventh Circuit· 2016-08-17· cited 41×
- Bryson Ray v. McCullough Payne & Haan, LLCEleventh Circuit· 2016-09-29· cited 22×
- Randall v. Maxwell & Morgan, P.C.D. Arizona· 2018-07-25· cited 3×
- Johnson v. Blitt & Gaines, P.C.N.D. Illinois· 2015-07-07
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Aaron Fox Toni Fox, Husband and Wife v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc., a South Dakota Corporation Jerold Kaplan Jane Doe Kaplan, Husband and WifeNinth Circuit· 1994-02-01· cited 196×
- Spooner v. EEN, INC.First Circuit· 2011-07-05· cited 95×
- Pruell v. Caritas ChristiFirst Circuit· 2011-07-14· cited 29×
- Harrington v. CACV OF COLORADO, LLCD. Massachusetts· 2007-08-30· cited 25×
- Victor Gulley v. Markoff & KrasnySeventh Circuit· 2011-12-22· cited 17×
- Pickens v. Collection Services of Athens, Inc.M.D. Georgia· 2001-02-08· cited 5×
- Smith v. Solomon & Solomon, P.C.D. Massachusetts· 2012-08-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.