Skip to main content

Ivey v. State

Citations

  • 277 S.W.3d 43
  • 2009 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 234
  • 2009 WL 322340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the interplay between our opinions in Snodgrass and Baker
  • “[Appellant] has not demonstrated that he received a longer sentence or was harmed by the admission of [inadmissible evidence].”
  • “It is well-established that a defendant’s right to have a jury assess punishment is a statutory right . . . .”
  • trial court may impose community supervision, where statutorily authorized to do so, even though defendant had elected to go to jury for punishment, jury did not recommend it, and defendant was not “desirous” of it
  • \[A] trial court may place an eligible defendant on community supervision even if the defendant has elected to have his punishment assessed by the jury and the jury does not recommend it.\
  • trial court may impose community supervision, where statutorily authorized to do so, even though defendant had elected to go to jury for punishment, jury did not recommend it, and defendant was not \desirous\ of it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Meyers, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Keller, Holcomb, Cochran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.