Rangel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statute restricting probation eligibility for certain offenses did not violate the equal protection clause
• “Even though the jury would not have been able to recommend probation, appellant could still have been granted probation by the court. Article 42.12, Section 3c, V.A.C.C.P.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ivey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-02-11· cited 75×
• Ivey, Mark
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-02-11
• Julie Ann Bell v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2019-08-22

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McNeese v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-06-02· cited 11×
• Kerry v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-03-25· cited 10×