IO Group, Inc. v. Jordon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff asserting copyright infringement claim would be prejudiced by failure to enter default judgment because plaintiff “would be without recourse to stop defendant’s infringement or to recover for the harm and damages Defendant has caused.”
• finding that plaintiff asserting copyright infringement claim would be prejudiced by failure to enter default judgment because plaintiff “would be without recourse to stop Defendant’s infringement or to recover for the harm and damages Defendant has caused”
• prejudice exists where denying the requested default judgment would leave the plaintiff 25 without a proper remedy
• prejudice exists where denying the requested default judgment would leave the plaintiff 4 without a proper remedy
• although defendant had appeared in the action 1 claim weighed in favor of default judgment
• prejudice exists where denying the requested default judgment would leave the plaintiff 8 without a proper remedy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).