Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security Cans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the possibility of 6 excusable neglect is remote” where a defendant participated early in a case, but later 7 stopped participating
• noting that “[i]f Plaintiffs’ 16 motion for default judgment is not granted, Plaintiffs will likely be without other recourse 17 for recovery” and will suffer prejudice
• finding 5 that, because the plaintiff sought non-monetary damages, the fourth Eitel factor favors 6 granting default judgment
• finding the fourth Eitel factor favors granting default judgment when monetary damages were not sought
• explaining how the Ninth Circuit has 9 suggested that these two Eitel factors require plaintiffs to state a claim on which they can 10 recover
• “If 16 Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment is not granted, Plaintiffs will likely be without 17 other recourse for recovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).