Pebble Beach Company, a California General Partnership v. Michael Caddy, an Individual

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an “internet domain 10 name” and “passive website” cannot establish specific jurisdiction on their own
• holding that, as 25 “Plaintiff’s arguments fail under the first prong . . . we need not address whether the claim arose 26 out of or resulted from [Defendant’s] forum-related activities or whether an exercise of 27 jurisdiction is reasonable . . .”
• finding no specific personal jurisdiction where 10 defendant’s actions lack “individualized targeting” at the forum state
• finding no specific personal jurisdiction where 9 defendant’s actions lack “individualized targeting” at the forum state
• “[F]or the purpose of this [prima facie] demonstration, the court resolves all disputed facts in favor of the plaintiff.”
• “[E]vidence of availment is 13 typically action taking place in the forum that invokes the benefits and protections 14 of the laws in the forum.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).