Ninth Circuit· 1/14/1986
Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCool
Citations
- 782 F.2d 1470
- 4 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 60
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22365
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “an unqualified oral stipulation of dismissal made in open court satisfies Rule 41(a)(1)(ii), even where no formal stipulation was signed by the parties”
- noting that the fact that the parties were engaged in settlement negotiations excused defendant from failing to answer
- stating that “[pjrior to obtaining a default judgment under either Rule 55(b)(1) or Rule 55(b)(2
- explaining that “default judgments are ordinarily disfavored” and courts should consider several factors in entering a default judgment
- holding default judgments generally are disfavored because “cases should be 28 decided on their merits whenever reasonably possible”
- noting that “the general rule [is] that default judgments are ordinarily disfavored” and cases should be decided on the merits whenever possible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wright, Canby, Wiggins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
135 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansC.D. California· 2002-12-27· cited 933×
- Newgen, LLC v. Safe Cig, LLCNinth Circuit· 2016-09-07· cited 501×
- DirecTV, Inc. v. Hoa HuynhNinth Circuit· 2007-09-11· cited 427×
- Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Castworld Products, Inc.C.D. California· 2003-12-31· cited 409×
- Alan Neuman Productions, Inc. v. Jere AlbrightNinth Circuit· 1989-03-02· cited 358×
- Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. v. CrawfordC.D. California· 2005-02-11· cited 286×
- Shanghai Automation Instrument Co., Ltd. v. KueiN.D. California· 2001-11-19· cited 183×
- Curtis v. Illumination Arts, Inc.W.D. Washington· 2014-07-17· cited 168×
- Vogel v. Rite Aid Corp.C.D. California· 2014-01-17· cited 157×
- Craigslist, Inc. v. NATUREMARKET, INC.N.D. California· 2010-03-05· cited 143×
- Metoyer v. ChassmanNinth Circuit· 2007-09-26· cited 127×
- A-Z International Great American Insurance Company v. Michael James PhillipsNinth Circuit· 2003-05-01· cited 118×
- Abney v. AlameidaS.D. California· 2004-08-20· cited 98×
- Yelp Inc. v. CatronN.D. California· 2014-10-01· cited 97×
- Silvagni v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.D. Nevada· 2017-03-29· cited 93×
- Russell v. City of Farmington HillsSixth Circuit· 2002-04-29· cited 92×
- Lam v. Investors Thrift (In Re Lam)Ninth Circuit· 1997-07-03· cited 90×
- WFND, LLC v. Fargo Marc, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-05-07· cited 85×
- Candido v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2007-06-22· cited 67×
- Moroccanoil, Inc. v. Allstate Beauty Products, Inc.C.D. California· 2012-03-02· cited 65×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeNinth Circuit· 1980-04-30· cited 1,798×
- Dionisio v. Dacanay and Reynaldo C. Dacanay, by His Father and Next Friend v. Saturnina Mendoza, Victor P. Mendoza, and Doe Insurance Co. No. 1Ninth Circuit· 1978-04-26· cited 290×
- Jose Luis Pena v. Seguros La Comercial, S.A.Ninth Circuit· 1985-09-04· cited 265×
- Gene M. Oswalt Et Vir v. Scripto, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. Tokai-Seiki Kk, a Japanese Corporation, Defendant-Third PartyThird Circuit· 1980-05-01· cited 180×
- Sams v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1980-08-11· cited 110×
- Pipeliners Local Union No. 798, Tulsa, Oklahoma, and A. Leroy Jones v. Fred H. EllerdTenth Circuit· 1974-10-02· cited 104×
- Islamic Republic of Iran, Air Force of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. The Boeing Company and Logistics Support CorporationNinth Circuit· 1985-10-04· cited 47×
- In The Matter Of Springpark AssociatesNinth Circuit· 1980-07-25· cited 22×
- Eitel v. McCoolE.D. Washington· 1984-09-10· cited 1×
- Springpark Associates v. Crown Life InsuranceSupreme Court· 1980-11-03· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.